For some time now there has been a race amongst camera manufacturer’s to produce the camera with the most mega-pixel or resolution. For the consumer this is a very appetizing marketing strategy. It is something that is somewhat tangible. It is a somewhat quantifiable factor into making one camera batter than another camera. In reality though what does all these pixels mean and it is a good thing to have a camera with heaps of pixels. Unfortunately there is no simple clear cur answer but there is a starting point and that is your need.
For most consumers you digital camera is a tool that works in conjunction with either your home ink jet printer or your local mini lab. This is good to keep in mind because your end product does help dictate what you need in a camera. To post a hypothetical situation, you have a home printer that will print of photo quality images and it does a pretty good job of that as well. You also have a nice digital SLR or point and shoot. Now lets say that you have one of the new Panasonic launches Lumix DMC-ZR1 digital compact which is very nice camera, or a digital SLR like the Olympus E-620 or a Nikon D5000. All of these are very nice camera. The Panasonic is a 12.1 MP camera with the Olympus and Nikon at 13.1 and 12.9 mega pixel respectively. All of these cameras will take a nice picture for you, but here is the catch, for you home printer what is happening with the data. Now lest imagine that you are printing a full A4 page on you home printer and we are printing at press resolution. This means you are printing at the resolution that is seen in a good quality magazine. This means that you image is actually a 8.6 Mp image. So that means that if your camera is taking images at larger resolution (MP) that your print size, you are suffering from data loss. Or another way to look at is that you are storing data on your computer that you are not using, and thus wasting space on your computer.
Now does this mean that you should not buy a camera with more pixels. Well no, but what it does mean is that you should be be caught my the MP marketing bug. Think about how you are going to use your camera before you buy something. After all, there is no point spending big dollars on a expensive camera when something cheaper will do you just as well. And besides, money saved on buying your camera could be used on your next holiday, or taking you partner out for dinner, or even helping someone out who is in need. Just food for thought.









In this setup the yellow line indicates the light coming from the flash head and the red line indicates where you would see the red eye. Notice that these two lines are coming to and from the subject at the exact same angle. As such the simplest way to remove redeye is to move your light source.





The three sections of exposure are connected but also fluid. As you fix one of the points the other two can be adjusted to get correct exposure. This correct exposure is also called the Exposure Value. 

The next question is how do you fix this problem. Remember our exposure triangle. to fix the problem all that you need to to is adjust one of the three values, Shutter speed, aperture or ISO. As a example, you are taking a image of a friend of yours and you have set your ISO at 400 and your shutter speed at 100th of a second. You have also set your aperture at f8. When you do your metering you notice that your light meter is reading -1. To fix this problem you will need to move one of your setting by a single stop, so aperture would go from f8 to f5.6 or shutter speed from 100 to 50 or ISO for 400 to 800. Any one of these options will fix the exposure problem.
The following is a selection from Wikipedia that provides a great explanation as to what a stop is .
by kentmarcs
no comments
add a comment link to this post email a friend