Form submitted successfully, thank you.

Error submitting form, please try again.

So many pixels

For some time now there has been a race amongst camera manufacturer’s to produce the camera with the most mega-pixel or resolution. For the consumer this is a very appetizing marketing strategy. It is something that is somewhat tangible. It is a somewhat quantifiable factor into making one camera batter than another camera. In reality though what does all these pixels mean and it is a good thing to have a camera with heaps of pixels. Unfortunately there is no simple clear cur answer but there is a starting point and that is your need.

For most consumers you digital camera is a tool that works in conjunction with either your home ink jet printer or your local mini lab. This is good to keep in mind because your end product does help dictate what you need in a camera. To post a hypothetical situation, you have a home printer that will print of photo quality images and it does a pretty good job of that as well. You also have a nice digital SLR or point and shoot. Now lets say that you have one of the new Panasonic launches Lumix DMC-ZR1 digital compact which is  very nice camera, or a digital SLR like the Olympus E-620 or a Nikon D5000. All of these are very nice camera. The Panasonic is a 12.1 MP camera with the Olympus and Nikon at 13.1 and 12.9 mega pixel respectively. All of these cameras will take a nice picture for you, but here is the catch, for you home printer what is happening with the data. Now lest imagine that you are printing a full A4 page on you home printer and we are printing at press resolution. This means you are printing at the resolution that is seen in a good quality magazine. This means that you image is actually a 8.6 Mp image. So that means that if your camera is taking images at larger resolution (MP) that your print size, you are suffering from data loss. Or another way to look at is that you are storing data on your computer that you are not using, and thus wasting space on your computer.

Now does this mean that you should not buy a camera with more pixels. Well no, but what it does mean is that you should be be caught my the MP marketing bug. Think about how you are going to use your camera before you buy something. After all, there is no point spending big dollars on a expensive camera when something cheaper will do you just as well. And besides, money saved on buying your camera could be used on your next holiday, or taking you partner out for dinner, or even helping someone out who is in need. Just food for thought.

Beginner photography – do’s and dont’s

There’s nothing like the feeling of getting a new toy. Remember when you were five and you’d rush out on Christmas morning to see what was under the tree with your name on it? It was like that for me when I first got my camera. I was frothing at the sheer delight of owning an SLR for the first time that I shot heaps of stuff. Stupid stuff. Hell, I think I even took pictures as I ate and slept.

And I think as photographers, we need to play with our new toys. We need to take bad pictures to weed them out from the good ones, and learn what not to do next time. And the same applies to our discovery of post-production. When we get our first copy of photoshop, and learn about layers and masks, sometimes we make bad decisions. But again, that’s fine if it leads to good decisions next time.  Unfortunately, some photographers do learn some things that – in my humble opinion – should never be learned in today’s photography. And it lingers in their work. And I can’t stand it.

One of these ‘tricks’ is selective colour. You’ve all seen it. It’s where most of an image is processed in black and white (or limited colour), and then a little portion or element of the image is retained in colour.

Here are some examples

Ugh. Apart from being bad photographs, for me, the selective colouring doesn’t work, on a few different levels:

  1. It’s way overdone – tons of photographers have done it before
  2. It’s often the first thing amateurs learn in photoshop, and therefore it looks cheap
  3. It’s mixing two very different elements of photography, that shouldn’t be mixed IMO

And the problem is not only that it exists, but that it’s done poorly. If it ever happens at all (which IMO shouldn’t), it should be used to draw attention to a particular part of the image. You remember the movie Schindler’s List, where the film was made entirely in black and white except for a few short clips of a girl in a red dress. The selective colouring works here, because a) It’s Steven Spielberg, and b) It was drawing attention to the girl, and making an important point about the Holocaust.

In the photograph examples above, in the first photograph, the use of selective colour draws attention to the lake (we should have our attention drawn to the couple) and in the second photograph we are told that the bouquet is more important than the bride.

For these reasons I prefer not to use it at all. I like my images to be clean and to the point. My pictures are either black and white, or they’re colour. Don’t mix two entirely different technologies. Black and white was what they used when they didn’t know how to make colour photographs. It can look arty, but don’t try and mix modern technology with art from the past. Do you ever see cars without engines being pulled by horses? No. Do you ever see a conventional oven with a fire underneath it? No. Do you ever see a colour photograph with black and white parts as well. Unfortunately, yes. Try to avoid it.

Correct Exposure

From a technical point there is such a thing as a correct exposure, however does the correct exposure give artistic effect. In this post I am going to ignore artistic intention and just deal with the technicality of correct exposure.

So what is correct exposure. Technically correct exposure for a scene is where the average of any given scene is calculated to be 18% Grey. And what exactly is 18% grey?

18% grey is the mid point between black and white. On the digital scale where 0 is black and 255 is while, 18% grey is an RGB value of 127 for Blue, Green and Red. So 18% grey looks like this.

18% Grey

In the printing industry it is standardised as the ink density which reflects 18% of incident light, however cameras seldom adhere to this. This topic deserves a discussion of its own, but for the purposes of this tutorial simply know that each camera has a default somewhere in the middle gray tones (~10-18% reflectance). Metering off of a subject which reflects more or less light than this may cause your camera’s metering algorithm to go awry– either through under or over-exposure, respectively. (Source)

This means that your camera, when calculating exposure is analysing the scene in an attempt to find the 18% grey point. To explain, when your camera looks at any scene it finds the darkest and lightest points in the image, for example black and white. Your camera knows that the darkest point should be black and the lightest should be white. So technically correct exposure is where the average of an image is calculated to be 18% Grey or a value of 127 for each of the RGB values.

Photoshop 18% Grey

On the left is a correctly exposed image, the right is the 18% grey averaged from the same image. You can see the spike on the histogram, this is the 18% spike averaged from the histogram.

18% grey correct exposure

Why is this 18% grey so important? There are two reasons why this is important. Firstly if you have an 18% grey card you can calculate correct exposure for any situation, but there is an easier way to calculate correct exposure. Secondly you can also use an 18% grey card to calculate correct colour balance.

Thankfully correct exposure has already been calculated for us and we don’t need to re-invent the wheel, so to speak. Photographically speaking correct exposure is called the sunny f16 rule. So what is the sunny f16 rule? The sunny f16 rule is a estimation of correct exposure under specific conditions. So how does this work?

The basic rule is: on a sunny day set your aperture to f16 and your shutter speed to your iso.

For Example:

  • On a sunny day if your ISO is 100 set your aperture to f16 and your shutter speed to 100th.
  • On a sunny day if your ISO is 200 set your aperture to f16 and your shutter speed to 200th of a second.
  • On a sunny day If your ISO is 400, set your aperture to f16 and your shutter speed to 1/400th or the nearest of value.

The sunny f16 rule also changes as your light changes.

You can use the sunny f16 rule in most lighting conditions, set your shutter speed to your nearest ISO value and the f number according to the following table.

sunny f16 rule

But why would you want to know and remember this rule when your digital camera has a automatic light meter. To put it simply, the automatic light meter in your digital camera does not work how you want it to work. In a camera, especially a digital camera the light meter works significantly well if there is a significant spread from light to dark reflected light, then the average reflection will be roughly 18% grey and the camera will expose correctly. Unfortunately most scenes do not have an even spread of lights to darks. Take for example a white animal in a white environment, i.e. a polar bear in snow. Here there is not an even spread of lights and darks.

HighKey scene

Most people who have photographed in snow will know that their images do not look correct, that is because too much light in the scene. This means that the light meter can not correct evaluate the exposure. In most cases the snow exposure is over by between 0.7 and 1 stop.

This leads me to my final point about correct exposure. To get “correct exposure” use your histogram. This I will explain at a later date, but to summarise, if you use the sunny f16 rule you can get a technically correct exposure, but is this what the image really requires, in some cases yes, but for a artistic and aesthetic point, sometimes the best images are those that do not conform to the rules.

Wedding Montage

Original image can be seen at KentMarcus.com

 
icon for podpress  Wedding Montage: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

External Flash – Benifits and drawbacks

As you get further into Digital photography there comes a point when your inbuilt flash will no longer fit your needs. This can be for any number of reasons including to red eye, lens shadow and throw distance. I will explain some of the disadvantages of inbuilt flash and how having a external flash can help solve some of these problems.

Red Eye

You may have noticed that when you take a photo using a flash that there is often a red spot in the middle of the subjects eyes. This is appropriate called Red Eye. So what is Red Eye? Red Eye is where the flash from your camera bounces off the back of the subjects retina and back into the camera. Because the back of the retina contains blood it appears to be red. This will only occur when there is a small angle between the camera and the light source. To reduce redeye the simplest this is to increase the angle between the light source and the camera lens.

redeye1

In this setup the light will travel from the flash directly into the eye and then back to the camera. The yellow indicates the light coming from the flash head and the red indicated the returning light back form the eye. Eliminating the red eye is very simple. All that we need to do is move out light source further away from the camera lens.

redeyeremovalIn this setup the yellow line indicates the light coming from the flash head and the red line indicates where you would see the red eye. Notice that these two lines are coming to and from the subject at the exact same angle. As such the simplest way to remove redeye is to move your light source.

Lens Shadow

What is lens shadow. Lens shadow is where you flash is hitting the top of your lens and creating a shadow on you image. The result is a darkening most often at the bottom of your image.

flash-shadow

lensshadow

To solve this probem the simplest method is to lift the flash further away form the lens. This is done using a external flash on the how shot mount. This increases the angle from the flash to the lens and this eliminates the lens shadow.

cameraflash

Flash throw

Flash throw is the distance that the flash will take affect. I often look at people with digital cameras at sporting events and watch them all taking flash photos, the best example is the opening of the Olympic games. I can’t help but enjoy the wonderful light show off all over the stadium, it is so pretty and yet completely useless for the person taking the picture. The flash on your camera only has a certain range that is will be effective. This range is determined by your ISO and your focal length. If you refer to your user manual it will give you a table that shows the effective range of your on camera flash. My old canon 10d for example, the effect range of the on camera flash is as follows.

picture-1

The canon 580 EXii has a vastly more effective range than the built in flash. For example the at ISO 100 my old 10d is just under 4 m not the 580 ex will light up to 58 m at a telephoto range. Canon lists the effective range of the 580 EX ii as between a 13m max at wide angle to the 58m previously mentioned at full zoom.

These are just a few if the problems that having a external flash can help solve.

Wake up early…

Have you ever been awake early enough to watch the sun rise? It’s a pretty magical experience. The air is cool and clean, and the land anticipates the arrival of the life giving energy that the sun brings.

As photographers, we can use that early light to our advantage.  Photography is all about light, and if we know how to best use that light, our photographs will be prettier. Mid-day light is terrible for photographing virtually anything. It’s harsh, flat and creates all kinds of crisp shadows. The sun is a very small light source in relation to its position (more distance from a light source means the light will be harder) from the earth, so we can’t really use it as soft, even light. Except for when there’s cloud cover. But when it’s in a position where we can use it as an accent or backlight, eg sunrise and sunset, we can make some really beautiful pictures.

On Sabbath I climbed Mount Warning with a group of friends and we watched sunrise and had a morning worship. I was silly enough to lug my entire camera kit up the whole way. But I took it out and snapped a few photos.

warning-panorama1

Here’s the trick when you’re shooting people but facing into the sun: don’t let your camera work out the exposure automatically. It’ll screw it up. I use spot metering (I’ve found Nikon’s spot metering to be superior to Canon’s) and expose for the faces of the people I’m trying to shoot.

Spot metering means that the camera will calculate exposures based on around 3% of what it sees in the middle of the frame (I think Nikon’s system is set up to use the active focus point). It doesn’t matter if you’ve got blown highlights elsewhere, you’re trying to draw attention to the face, so keep that well exposed.

Here’s an example of the crisp colours and golden lighting you can play with when you shoot in those early rays:

dsc_0246-small

It’s not that hard to get out of bed an hour earlier. The kind of orangey glow that the first light brings seriously only lasts a matter of minutes. And best of all, your pictures will thank you.

More tk…

Levi

All Stops – Part 2 Metering

It is all very fine to understand what a f stop or a stop is, but how does that knowledge allow you to get a correctly exposed image. Well before I get into the deep dark secrets of exposure it is important to under stand the factors that make up exposure

Exposure is controlled by ISO, Aperture and Shutter speed. the question that I get asked all the time is “what are the correct settings to use”?. The simple answer is that there is so such thing as a correct setting. You camera setting allow the recording if the image in a specific way. Take for example you want to create a image that has a lot of blurring in it. This indicates that you will need to use a slow shutter speed. another example would be where you want to have a very fine depth of field, then this dictates that you are going to use a small aperture like f2 for example. Now what this means is that you can then manipulate the remaining two setting to get a correctly exposed image.

This diagram may help in the explination.

exposureThe three sections of exposure are connected but also fluid. As you fix one of the points the other two can be adjusted to get correct exposure. This correct exposure is also called the Exposure Value. Wikkipedia gives a excellant defination as

exposure value (EV) denotes all combinations of camera shutter speed and relative aperture that give the same exposure.

Back to the original question, what is a stop, and my addition how does this relate to exposure. Well to recap, so far we know what a sop is in aperture terms, for example f5.6 and f8 are stops. There also one stop difference between f5.6 and f8. There is also one stop difference between f8 and f11. However there is two stops difference between f5.6 and f11. Hopefully you brain has not exploded yet. Stop also refer to shutter speed and ISO. Again the full stops are 100, 200, 400 etc. There is also one stop difference between 100 and 200 as well as 200 and 400, with two stops difference between 100 and 400. For ISO it works in the same manner. One stop between 100 and 200, two stops between 100 and 400. Brains still working?

So how does this work with exposure. Well to explain this you will need to have a look at your camera. On your camera you should find a light meter. It will often look like one of the following two image.

metering

This image comes for inside a Canon 5d but all digital SLR cameras will have one similar. It may be located at the bottom of your view finder however. SO what does this mean, this is a graphical representation of correct exposure. It is a scale form under exposed to over exposed with correct exposure in the middle. Digital SLR cameras often also have the numbers -2, -1, 0 , 1 and 2 also indicated on the bar.

meteringexposure

This is the forth instance where stops comes into play. If your light indicator is at position 0 that means that you have a correctly exposed image. If it is at -2 then your image will be under exposed by 2 stops. Similarly if it is at 2 then your image will be overexposed by 2 stops.

exposure-meteringThe next question is how do you fix this problem. Remember our exposure triangle. to fix the problem all that you need to to is adjust one of the three values, Shutter speed, aperture or ISO. As a example, you are taking a image of a friend of yours and you have set your ISO at 400 and your shutter speed at 100th of a second. You have also set your aperture at f8. When you do your metering you notice that your light meter is reading -1. To fix this problem you will need to move one of your setting by a single stop, so aperture would go from f8 to f5.6 or shutter speed from 100 to 50 or ISO for 400 to 800. Any one of these options will fix the exposure problem.

Next I will explain how exactly a light meter work in your camera.

If you have any questions feel free to ask.

All Stops – Part 1

I was having a conversation last night with a friend of mine and he was asking me to comment on some photos that he had recently taken. In the course of the discussion he asked me what I meant when I said that the image looked under exposed by about 1 stop. In a effort to try and explain what I meant, it occurred to me that this would be a great place to discuss the meaning of a stop.

So to start out, what is a stop. Well a stop is just like any measure. It defines a set value of something. In photography terms a stop has four different vales, just to make it confusing. These values are aperture, shutter speed, ISO (for digital) and Exposure Value of EV. So what exactly are these values?

The modern digital camera is not like my old hasselblad in that there are a lot more settings that you can have on your camera, but for this explanation i am only going to deal with full stops. So what is a full stop. This diagram will give the values for aperture, shutter speed and iso in full stops.

stopsThe following is a selection from Wikipedia that provides a great explanation as to what a stop is .

In photography, stops are also a unit used to quantify ratios of light or exposure, with one stop meaning a factor of two, or one-half. The one-stop unit is also known as the EV (exposure value) unit. On a camera, the f-number is usually adjusted in discrete steps, known as f-stops. Each “stop” is marked with its corresponding f-number, and represents a halving of the light intensity from the previous stop.

Shutter speeds are arranged in a similar scale, so that one step in the shutter speed scale corresponds to one stop in the aperture scale. Opening up a lens by one stop allows twice as much light to fall on the film in a given period of time, therefore to have the same exposure at this larger aperture, as at the previous aperture, the shutter speed is set twice as fast (i.e., the shutter is open half as long); the film will usually respond equally to these equal amounts of light, since it has the property known as reciprocity. Alternatively, one could use a film that is half as sensitive to light, with the original shutter speed.

Photographers sometimes express other exposure ratios in terms of ’stops’. Ignoring the f-number markings, the f-stops make a logarithmic scale of exposure intensity. Given this interpretation, one can then think of taking a half-step along this scale, to make an exposure difference of “half a stop”.

In Part 2 – stops and correct exposure.

p7-1 Layer Introduction

 
icon for podpress  Layers: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download
Technorati Profile